LANGUAGE! Live offers more for struggling readers than any other product. Proven foundational and advanced reading intervention. Peer-to-peer instruction. Literacy brain science. A captivating modern, digital platform for grades 5–12. All
in one affordable solution. More is possible
Literacy solutions guided by the Science of Reading pedagogy, the Structured Literacy approach, and explicit teaching of sound-letter relationships for effective reading instruction.
Grades K-5 blended literacy intervention
Grades K-5 online reading practice
Grades 4-12 print literacy program
Grades K-12 writing program
Grades 4-12 literacy intervention
TransMath® Third Edition is a comprehensive math intervention curriculum that targets middle and high school students who lack the foundational skills necessary for entry into algebra and/or who are two or more years below grade level in
A targeted math intervention program for struggling students in grades 2–8 that provides additional opportunities to master critical math concepts and skills.
Empowers students in grades K–8 to master math content at their own pace in a motivating online environment.
NUMBERS is an interactive, hands-on mathematics professional development offering for elementary and middle school math teachers.
Best Behavior Features Elements to Create a Happy, Healthy School Environment
LETRS professional learning is now offered exclusively by Lexia.
Reliable, Research-Based Assessment Solutions to Support Literacy and Math
Assess essential pre-literacy and oral language skills needed for kindergarten.
Enhance early reading success and identify students experiencing difficulty acquiring foundational literacy skills.
A universal screening and progress monitoring assessment that measures the acquisition of content-area literacy skills for 7th and 8th grade students.
A companion tool for use with Acadience Reading K–6 to determine instructional level and progress monitoring.
Assess critical reading skills for students in grades K–6 and older students with very low skills.
Predict early mathematics success and identify students experiencing difficulty acquiring foundational math skills.
Give educators a fast and accurate way to enter results online and receive a variety of reports that facilitate instructional decision making.
A brief assessment that can be used with Acadience Reading K–6 to screen students for reading difficulties such as dyslexia.
A new, online touch-enabled test administration and data system that allows educators to assess students and immediately see results, providing robust reporting at the student, class, school, and district levels.
Look to ClearSight to measure student mastery of state standards with items previously used on state high-stakes assessments. ClearSight Interim and Checkpoint Assessments include multiple forms of tests for grades K–high school.
Unparalleled support for our educator partners
We work with schools and districts to customize an implementation and ongoing support plan.
Grades 5-12 blended literacy intervention
Focused on engaging students with age-appropriate instruction and content that supports and enhances instruction.
Reading intervention for grades K–5.
At Voyager Sopris Learning®, our mission is to work with educators to help them meet and surpass their goals for student achievement.
Step Up to Writing®
by Dr. Ruth Kaminski on Jul 14, 2022
With a nod to Benjamin Franklin, let me begin by saying that an ounce of good, quality instruction to prevent reading difficulties is worth a pound of reading remediation.
There is compelling evidence that reading outcomes improve the most for students who receive instructional support and intervention in the earlier grades. In fact, there is evidence that the risk for reading disabilities such as dyslexia may be prevented
or at least reduced through early identification and instruction on the critical early literacy and reading skills. Unfortunately, the latest report from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in 2019 reveals that 65 percent of fourth-grade
students performed below the NAEP proficient reading level and 34 percent performed below the NAEP basic level on reading. It seems that we remain a long way from preventing reading difficulties.
If it is more powerful to prevent reading difficulties than to remediate them, how can we unleash the power of prevention? What are the steps we need to take? To prevent reading difficulties, we need to start early and focus on the three areas shown in
the Venn diagram—curriculum and instruction, assessment, and professional learning. It is important to state at the outset that the ability to provide services and support in all three areas is necessary to prevent reading difficulties—any
one by itself would be insufficient.
Necessary Components of a Prevention-Oriented Approach to Reading Difficulty
Curriculum and instruction: The past two decades of research about the acquisition of reading have provided converging evidence about not only what skills to teach but also how to teach them. The Simple
View of Reading provides a framework for reading instruction that includes skills for accurate word recognition as well as skills involved in the comprehension of language. Thus, the skills critical to becoming a reader include phonological processing
and phonemic awareness, phonics skills and understanding of the alphabetic principle, word reading and decoding, accuracy and fluency reading connected text, and the skills necessary for language comprehension (e.g., vocabulary, morphology, syntax).
As described by Dr. Louisa Moats (2020), “Teaching reading is rocket science” and effective classroom instruction focused on the effective teaching of the essential early literacy and reading skills is at the core of preventing reading
Assessment: One might ask if, in the best of all possible worlds, we provided effective curriculum and instruction to all students, would we really need assessment? To address this issue, I will harken
back to two of my mentors in the field of early assessment, whose work in this area provided the foundation for my own work and which holds as true today as it did then. The first is Dr. Stanley Deno, the founder (along with his team at the Institute
for Learning Disabilities at the University of Minnesota in the 1970s-1980s) of curriculum-based measurement (CBM). Central to Dr. Deno’s work is the notion that even effective research-based instruction that is delivered well will not work
equally well for all students. Regarding educational assessment, Dr. Deno makes the point that the problem is not that we collect too few data in education, but rather the wrong data. What is needed, Dr. Deno stated, are reliable
and valid assessments that can be used efficiently over time to provide data to document the effectiveness of instruction and intervention. This is imperative if we are to truly prevent reading disabilities.
Providing a similar perspective, Dr. Diane Bricker, a pioneer in the field of early intervention, has long put forth the notion that assessment should determine the format of intervention for individual children as well as assess the impact of intervention
on individuals and groups of children. In an early paper, she termed assessment and intervention “the inseparable mix” and stated that assessment serves several functions including: a) guiding the differentiation of instruction for individual
children b) providing feedback about the success of instruction and intervention for individual children c) providing a system for determining the value of instructional or intervention programs for groups of children.
The early tenets of the work of Drs. Deno and Bricker have been supported and expanded upon by numerous practitioners, researchers, and policy makers during the past several decades leading to the development of a wide array of reliable and valid assessment
tools, appropriate for different ages and grade levels, that can be used for data-based decision making. Such assessment tools are integral to systemwide approaches to service delivery such as RTI and MTSS.
Within a prevention-oriented approach, periodic and ongoing assessment is used to:
The bottom line is that a system of periodic and ongoing assessment is critical to a preventive approach. As teachers provide research-based curricula and instruction, it is important to know what is working for which students. Even more important, if
an instruction or intervention is not working, it is imperative to use the data to do something different for that student! (For a description of how to use data for these purposes, see Acadience Learning 2022 and Powell-Smith, 2021.)
Professional Learning: Although it is clear that research-based curriculum and instruction and assessment tools are integral to a prevention-oriented approach to reading difficulties, there are many
teachers who may not have received adequate teacher preparation in these areas in their preservice training. To effectively implement research-based instructional and assessment practices into the classroom, teachers need to know and understand:
Teacher’s knowledge about the development of reading and how to teach the essential early literacy and reading skills as well as understanding of how to link data to reading instruction has been found to be related to literacy outcomes of students.
Thus, teachers need to have knowledge and skills in all of these areas. If, for example, teachers understand how to assess the essential skills but not how to interpret and use the data, prevention will not work. If they understand how to assess the
skills and use the data, but do not understand how to effectively teach the skills, prevention will not work. Additionally, there is evidence that the greatest impact of professional development is found when services are multifaceted and include
strategies such as coaching, mentoring, and/or participating in collaborative study and communities of practice in addition to traditional in-service training workshops.
A large body of scientific evidence during the past 30 years points to what is possible to prevent or greatly reduce reading difficulties. We have the knowledge and tools to teach the essential skills and to assess student’s progress toward goals
and evaluate the effectiveness of our instruction. The power of prevention to change outcomes for students and schools is achievable if we join forces across disciplines and support educators to implement the instructional and assessment practices
that will make a difference.
I’ll be talking about this subject in more depth during two upcoming events. I’ll be presenting a webinar on this topic July 20, called “The Power of Prevention: The Critical Need for Assessment.” On August 4, I will be the guest on the EDVIEW360 podcast. I hope you’ll join me!
Acadience Learning (2022). Dyslexia Screening and the use of Acadience Reading. https://www.voyagersopris.com/resources/dyslexia-screening-and-the-use-of-acadience-reading-k-6/
Bricker, D., & Littman, D. (1982). Intervention and evaluation: The inseparable mix. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1(4), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/027112148200100407
Connor, C.M., Alberto, P.A., Compton, D.L., O’Connor, R.E. (2014). Improving Reading Outcomes for Students with or at Risk for Reading Disabilities: A Synthesis of the Contributions from the Institute of Education Sciences Research Centers (NCSER
2014-3000). Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. This report is available on the IES website at http://ies.ed.gov.
Deno, S.L. (1986). Formative evaluation of individual student programs: A new role for school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 3, 358-374.
Kaminski, R. (2021). Screening for dyslexia: Not a “one-and-done” event. https://www.voyagersopris.com/blog/edview360/2021/10/05/screening-for-dyslexia-not-a-one-and-done-event-by-dr.-ruth-kaminski-acadience-learning?utm_campaign=Oktopost-2021+VSL%3A+Podcasts&utm_content=Oktopost-facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook
Moats, L.C. (2020). Teaching Reading is Rocket Science: What expert teachers of reading should know and be able to do. American Educator. https://www.aft.org/ae/summer2020/moats
Powell-Smith, K.A., (2022) Aligning Assessment to meet schoolwide literacy needs. https://www.voyagersopris.com/blog/edview360/2022/02/09/aligning-assessment-to-meet-schoolwide-literacy-needs
Add your email here to sign up for EDVIEW 360 blogs, webinars, and podcasts. We'll send you an email when new posts and episodes are published.