LANGUAGE! Live offers more for struggling readers than any other product. Proven foundational and advanced reading intervention. Peer-to-peer instruction. Literacy brain science. A captivating modern, digital platform for grades 5–12. All
in one affordable solution. More is possible
Grades K-5 blended literacy intervention
Grades K-5 online reading practice
Grades 4-12 print literacy program
Grades K-12 writing program
Grades 4-12 literacy intervention
Grades Pre-K-5 adaptive blended literacy instruction
Grades 6-12 adaptive blended literacy instruction
TransMath® Third Edition is a comprehensive math intervention curriculum that targets middle and high school students who lack the foundational skills necessary for entry into algebra and/or who are two or more years below grade level in
A targeted math intervention program for struggling students in grades 2–8 that provides additional opportunities to master critical math concepts and skills.
Empowers students in grades K–8 to master math content at their own pace in a motivating online environment.
Inside Algebra engages at-risk students in grades 8–12 through explicit, conceptually based instruction to ensure mastery of algebraic skills.
Developed by renowned literacy experts Dr. Louisa Moats and Dr. Carol Tolman,
LETRS® is a flexible literacy professional development solution for preK–5 educators. LETRS earned the International Dyslexia Association's Accreditation and provides teachers with the skills they need to master the fundamentals
of reading instruction—phonological awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, writing, and language.
Online professional development event is designed for preK to college educators interested in improving student success in reading and writing
Literacy solutions guided by LETRS’ science of reading pedagogy, the Structured Literacy approach, and explicit teaching of sound-letter relationships for effective reading instruction.
NUMBERS is an interactive, hands-on mathematics professional development offering for elementary and middle school math teachers.
Best Behavior Features Elements to Create a Happy, Healthy School Environment
Look to ClearSight to measure student mastery of state standards with items previously used on state high-stakes assessments. ClearSight Interim and Checkpoint Assessments include multiple forms of tests for grades K–high school.
Reliable, Research-Based Assessment Solutions to Support Literacy and Math
Enhance early reading success and identify students experiencing difficulty acquiring foundational literacy skills.
A companion tool for use with Acadience Reading K–6 to determine instructional level and progress monitoring.
Assess critical reading skills for students in grades K–6 and older students with very low skills.
Assess essential pre-literacy and oral language skills needed for kindergarten.
Predict early mathematics success and identify students experiencing difficulty acquiring foundational math skills.
Give educators a fast and accurate way to enter results online and receive a variety of reports that facilitate instructional decision making.
A brief assessment that can be used with Acadience Reading K–6 to screen students for reading difficulties such as dyslexia.
A new, online touch-enabled test administration and data system that allows educators to assess students and immediately see results, providing robust reporting at the student, class, school, and district levels.
Research-based, computer-adaptive reading and language assessment for grades K-12.
Unparalleled support for our educator partners
We work with schools and districts to customize an implementation and ongoing support plan.
Grades 5-12 blended literacy intervention
Flexible literacy professional development solution for preK–12 educators.
Focused on engaging students with age-appropriate instruction and content that supports and enhances instruction.
Reading intervention for grades K–5.
At Voyager Sopris Learning®, our mission is to work with educators to help them meet and surpass their goals for student achievement.
Step Up to Writing®
by Bea Moore Luchin on Mar 30, 2016
I’d like to take you on another journey along the road of the language of mathematics with a stop at the intersection of “math concepts and symbolic notations.”
Sometimes the mathematics conversation is just as confusing to students as this collection of signs is to a driver in an unfamiliar situation. There appears to be a variety of symbols used to identify the different types of roads in the area, just as we have a variety of concepts, operations, and relations that are conveyed through symbolic notations.
To further complicate the issue, in math we sometimes have a variety of symbols used to convey the same concept or idea. Imagine the student’s dismay when he or she is not familiar with a new symbolic notation that is being used but is familiar (and perhaps proficient) with a different notation. This can certainly be a blow to some students’ math confidence.
Welcome back to those who have been following the conversation about how to unlock the language of math for students. Let’s explore some of the challenges with mathematical words that have more than one symbolic representation.
Multiplication is a simple word, yet we can convey the idea of multiplying using a variety of symbolic notations. Consider the phrase “the product of 12 and 9.” The phrase looks completely harmless at first. However, we can translate this as 12 x 9 or 12•9 or 12(9). To further complicate things, we will eventually place more emphasis on the use of variables. So, we move to “the product of 12 and a number, where h represents the number,” which could be represented as 12 x h or 12•h or 12(h) or 12h. And don’t forget the conversation about the commutative property, which will allow me to “switch” the order of the factors and yield the same result but a different model if I were creating a visual or concrete model. Consider an array for 12 x 9. You will create 12 rows and 9 columns, but for 9 x 12 you will create 9 rows and 12 columns.
Division is another mathematical concept with a variety of symbolic representations. Consider 5 divided by 2. Five is the dividend, 2 is the divisor, and we have 3 different ways to write the expression.
Five divided by 2 is further complicated by the directionality of the reading. In the United States, we read our sentences and most of our printed information from left to right. So the correct reading of 5 ÷ 2 is easily mastered. But when the division is represented using the division radical, shown at left above, students often misread because they are still employing a left to right direction of reading where they now need to switch to the right to left reading direction. Finally, after years of these two familiar representations, we transition to the vertical representation, shown at right above, when our emphasis is on algebraic representations.
Well, there was certainly no surprise there, right? But when we do not push pause, and make sure that students understand all the representations used in previous years before we transition to a new representation, we take a risk of leaving some students caught in a dilemma regarding how to read the situation. Sometimes they can successfully navigate their way to the correct reading and understanding, but there are also those who are unsuccessful. If left unidentified, these simple misreadings and misinterpretations become larger issues in a formal algebra program of study. And remember, the directionality of the reading is a critical key to success as well; memorization of symbols is not enough.
Let’s take a look at one additional mathematical concept that has multiple symbolic notations: congruency. When we think of the word congruent, we immediately think of this symbol: ≅
But when used in context, we often use other notations—the tick marks and arcs. Consider this visual:
The tick marks indicate which sides are congruent, and the arcs identify the congruent angles. A student may have memorized the definition for congruent but may not know how to “read” the visual if attention has not been paid to the notations that support the idea of congruency in mathematics.
In wrapping up this conversation, I would like to take you further down the math road to the intersection of “symbols we use that have one meaning in math and a different meaning outside of math.” Review the following table for a few examples:
As you can see, the road to understanding the language of math can easily be a bumpy one if we do not push pause and make sure the language is understood.
Add your email here to sign up for EDVIEW 360 blogs, webinars, and podcasts. We'll send you an email when new posts and episodes are published.